According to DEBKAfile’s exclusive military sources, Bashar Assad’s armed forces
have fired at least 20 Scud surface-to-surface missiles in the Damascus region.
They were aimed at the eastern suburbs where rebels have dug in.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Syrian Islamists meet Hizballah head-on – take in arms from Bosnia, Kosovo
End Of Days News
Reports Monday, Feb. 18, that Hizballah has transferred 1,000 fighters to the Syrian district of Homs are a red herring to distract attention from six new major developments in the Syrian civil conflict - revealed here by debkafile’s military and intelligence sources:
1. Contrary to reports of Hizballah attacks on villages in the Homs region, the thousand Hizballah militiamen have moved in to defend the predominantly Shiite villages of the area whose population is loyal to Bashar Assad. They are there to relieve the Syrian army of the burden of defending these Shiites against rebel attack.
Hizballah has also undertaken to guard Shiite holy shrines in Syria.
2. The Muslim factions of the Syrian revolt have received their first heavy weapons consignments, mostly Kornet and Fagot anti-tank missiles. Their improved armaments account for the new edge they display in battles with Bashar Assad’s army, although reports of their conquests are much exaggerated.
3. These arms are coming from two sources: radical Islamist organizations in Bosnia and Kosovo, some of them associated with al Qaeda – at least ideologically. It is hard to say who is organizing and bankrolling the new weapons sea route to Syria. According to one theory, it is the Albanian mafia.
4. For the first time, Syrian rebels are taking in arms unsupervised by any of the Western or Arab agencies involved in the Syrian revolt.
5. Most of the incoming weapons are destined for the Islamist Jabhat al-Nusra, the rebel faction identified with al Qaeda.
6. The Jabhat al-Nusra, newly armed with hardware from Bosnia and Kosovo, have pushed across the border into Lebanon, our sources reveal, and are harassing Hizballah in its home bases in the Beqaa Valley. Night after night in the last ten days, small bands of Islamist fighters, weighed down by heavy loads of rockets, are attacking Hizballah strongholds and isolated guard and watch posts and ambushing military vehicles.
Both are designated terrorist groups by the United States government.
The Syrian conflict has indeed spilled over the border into Lebanon. It is also turning more and more into a sectarian confrontation between extremist Sunnis and radical Shiites.
; "Fagot anti-tank missile")
Fagot anti-tank
missile
Reports Monday, Feb. 18, that Hizballah has transferred 1,000 fighters to the Syrian district of Homs are a red herring to distract attention from six new major developments in the Syrian civil conflict - revealed here by debkafile’s military and intelligence sources:
1. Contrary to reports of Hizballah attacks on villages in the Homs region, the thousand Hizballah militiamen have moved in to defend the predominantly Shiite villages of the area whose population is loyal to Bashar Assad. They are there to relieve the Syrian army of the burden of defending these Shiites against rebel attack.
Hizballah has also undertaken to guard Shiite holy shrines in Syria.
2. The Muslim factions of the Syrian revolt have received their first heavy weapons consignments, mostly Kornet and Fagot anti-tank missiles. Their improved armaments account for the new edge they display in battles with Bashar Assad’s army, although reports of their conquests are much exaggerated.
3. These arms are coming from two sources: radical Islamist organizations in Bosnia and Kosovo, some of them associated with al Qaeda – at least ideologically. It is hard to say who is organizing and bankrolling the new weapons sea route to Syria. According to one theory, it is the Albanian mafia.
4. For the first time, Syrian rebels are taking in arms unsupervised by any of the Western or Arab agencies involved in the Syrian revolt.
5. Most of the incoming weapons are destined for the Islamist Jabhat al-Nusra, the rebel faction identified with al Qaeda.
6. The Jabhat al-Nusra, newly armed with hardware from Bosnia and Kosovo, have pushed across the border into Lebanon, our sources reveal, and are harassing Hizballah in its home bases in the Beqaa Valley. Night after night in the last ten days, small bands of Islamist fighters, weighed down by heavy loads of rockets, are attacking Hizballah strongholds and isolated guard and watch posts and ambushing military vehicles.
Both are designated terrorist groups by the United States government.
The Syrian conflict has indeed spilled over the border into Lebanon. It is also turning more and more into a sectarian confrontation between extremist Sunnis and radical Shiites.
This does not touch the earthquakes go to www.intellicast.com to see the signs of the end days!
End Of Days News
Luke 21:11
11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.
Earthquake strikes near Rome
5.0 Earthquake Strikes Greece
3.4 magnitude earthquake shakes southern California
3.3-magnitude earthquake hits near Borrego Springs
Luke 21:11
11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.
Click Link
Im ready to meet my LORD! Signs are here, our redemption draweth nigh!
End Of Days News
Luke 21: 25-28
25 And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring;
26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.
27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.
Russian Politician Denies Meteorite, Claims US Weapons Tests
Russian Cleric: Meteorite Was Lord's Message
Another meteor? 'Fireballs' light up Florida sky
Fireball in Northern California sky caught on camera may have been a meteor sighting
Luke 21: 25-28
25 And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring;
26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.
27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.
Click Link
FAA Working To Fill The Sky With Drones
End Of Days News
Last week, President Barack Obama approved legislation that will likely rapidly increase the use of drones for surveillance in the United States.
The FAA Modernization Act of 2012, which contains provisions to modernize aviation laws and to immediately integrate unmanned aircraft systems, was signed into law by Obama Thursday.
Meanwhile, the Federal Aviation Administration called on State and local governments as well as universities to compete to be the location of one of six unmanned aircraft test sites the agency will operate as mandated by the 2012 FAA Reauthorization Act. The agency says it will use the sites to better understand the dangers and benefits of domestic drones before they are fully introduced to the National Airspace System by 2015.
“We expect to learn how unmanned aircraft systems operate in different environments and how they will impact air traffic operations,” FAA Chief Michael Huerta said in a statement. “The test sites will inform the agency as we develop standards for certifying unmanned aircraft and determine necessary air traffic requirements.”
Part of the mission for the test sites is to develop a set of certification standards and air traffic requirements for drones and to designate airspace for the unmanned aerial vehicles. According to some reports, government bodies in roughly two dozen States have expressed interest in becoming drone research locations.
The FAA has already authorized 106 Federal, State and local entities — including law enforcement agencies, regulators and universities — to operate domestic drones. Current requirements, however, limit the size of the aircraft and how far they are allowed to fly.
FAA Working To Fill The Sky With Drones
February 18, 2013 by Sam Rolley
UPI FILE
The FAA Modernization Act of 2012, which contains provisions to modernize aviation laws and to immediately integrate unmanned aircraft systems, was signed into law by Obama Thursday.
Meanwhile, the Federal Aviation Administration called on State and local governments as well as universities to compete to be the location of one of six unmanned aircraft test sites the agency will operate as mandated by the 2012 FAA Reauthorization Act. The agency says it will use the sites to better understand the dangers and benefits of domestic drones before they are fully introduced to the National Airspace System by 2015.
“We expect to learn how unmanned aircraft systems operate in different environments and how they will impact air traffic operations,” FAA Chief Michael Huerta said in a statement. “The test sites will inform the agency as we develop standards for certifying unmanned aircraft and determine necessary air traffic requirements.”
Part of the mission for the test sites is to develop a set of certification standards and air traffic requirements for drones and to designate airspace for the unmanned aerial vehicles. According to some reports, government bodies in roughly two dozen States have expressed interest in becoming drone research locations.
The FAA has already authorized 106 Federal, State and local entities — including law enforcement agencies, regulators and universities — to operate domestic drones. Current requirements, however, limit the size of the aircraft and how far they are allowed to fly.
Severe Ammo shortage at local gun stores
End Of Days News
COLUMBUS, Ga. --
A national ammunition shortage is now severely affecting local gun stores. For the past month, "The Firing Pin" in Opelika hasn't been able to keep up with demand and now they’re out of most ammo.
The store first noticed a spike in ammo sales just before Christmas. Co-Owner Rick Bradshaw believes recent massacres and now the president's gun control measures are behind the increased demand.
“When I go to the rounds I probably go to about five different places when I go look,” said Robert Betts. Usually, he said it’s pretty easy for him to find ammunition for his guns, but not lately.
"We'll right now there seems to be a lot of panic buying going on and it's pretty hard to find the more popular calibers and when you do prices tend to be gouged,” said Betts.
Normally several thousand rounds are on hand at “The Firing Pin” but now the that shelves store ammo, sit empty.
"It's all been dried up,” said Bradshaw. What ammunition is left has a buyer's-limit. Bradshaw said talks of banning assault weapons and restricting magazines to a maximum of 10 bullets is fueling the demand increase and manufacturers can't keep up with orders.
"They're being told by those manufacturers that it's going to be approximately 18 months before their orders are fulfilled,” Bradshaw said.
Bradshaw said most gun stores prepared for a spike in sales before the November election fearing new gun control measures. What they didn't anticipate was the mass school shooting in Connecticut and gun rights being thrust to the front of everyone's minds.
While congress debates whether to pass the president's proposals, gun advocates will be in limbo.
"I mean basically right now is just a waiting game. I mean... it’s pretty bad,” Bradshaw said.
Other local gun stores said they are also experiencing an ammo shortage. Bradshaw believes it will last for at least six months.
Lawmakers will take up President Obama's gun control measures in the coming days. Democrats are confident some measures will pass while Republicans are more skeptical.
COLUMBUS, Ga. --
A national ammunition shortage is now severely affecting local gun stores. For the past month, "The Firing Pin" in Opelika hasn't been able to keep up with demand and now they’re out of most ammo.
The store first noticed a spike in ammo sales just before Christmas. Co-Owner Rick Bradshaw believes recent massacres and now the president's gun control measures are behind the increased demand.
“When I go to the rounds I probably go to about five different places when I go look,” said Robert Betts. Usually, he said it’s pretty easy for him to find ammunition for his guns, but not lately.
"We'll right now there seems to be a lot of panic buying going on and it's pretty hard to find the more popular calibers and when you do prices tend to be gouged,” said Betts.
Normally several thousand rounds are on hand at “The Firing Pin” but now the that shelves store ammo, sit empty.
"It's all been dried up,” said Bradshaw. What ammunition is left has a buyer's-limit. Bradshaw said talks of banning assault weapons and restricting magazines to a maximum of 10 bullets is fueling the demand increase and manufacturers can't keep up with orders.
"They're being told by those manufacturers that it's going to be approximately 18 months before their orders are fulfilled,” Bradshaw said.
Bradshaw said most gun stores prepared for a spike in sales before the November election fearing new gun control measures. What they didn't anticipate was the mass school shooting in Connecticut and gun rights being thrust to the front of everyone's minds.
While congress debates whether to pass the president's proposals, gun advocates will be in limbo.
"I mean basically right now is just a waiting game. I mean... it’s pretty bad,” Bradshaw said.
Other local gun stores said they are also experiencing an ammo shortage. Bradshaw believes it will last for at least six months.
Lawmakers will take up President Obama's gun control measures in the coming days. Democrats are confident some measures will pass while Republicans are more skeptical.
Feds buying enough bullets for '24-year war'
End Of Days News
Federal, non-military agencies, noted radio host Mark Levin last week, have purchased enough ammunition recently to not only shoot every American five times, but also engage in a prolonged, domestic war.
The numbers are based on recent reports that put the total federal ammunition buy in the last 10 months at approaching two billion rounds.
“To provide some perspective,” Levin noted, “experts estimate that at the peak of the Iraq war American troops were firing around 5.5 million rounds per month. At that rate, the [Department of Homeland Security] is armed now for a 24-year Iraq war. A 24-year Iraq war!”
What do federal agencies need with all that ammunition?
The government’s only official explanation for the massive ammo buy is that law enforcement agents in the respective agencies need the bullets for “mandatory quarterly firearms qualifications and other training sessions.”
The staggering number and lack of details in the official explanation, however, has led to rampant speculation, including concerns the DHS is arming itself to fight off insurrection among Americans.
“I’m going to tell you what I think is going on,” Levin offered. “I don’t think domestic insurrection.
Law enforcement and national security agencies, they play out multiple scenarios. … I’ll tell you what I think they’re simulating: the collapse of our financial system, the collapse of our society and the potential for widespread violence, looting, killing in the streets, because that’s what happens when an economy collapses.
“I suspect that just in case our fiscal situation, our monetary situation, collapses, and following it the civil society collapses, that is the rule of law, they want to be prepared,” Levin said. “I know why the government’s arming up: It’s not because there’s going to be an insurrection; it’s because our society is unraveling.”
As WND reported, even major gun-rights organizations like the National Rifle Association have attempted to tamp down worries over the amount of ammunition, suggesting the number of bullets bought, spread out over five years and across all the federal agencies with armed agents – considering the number of rounds needed for training, qualification and service bags – isn’t exorbitant.
At the same time, however, others have wondered if billions of bullets isn’t too many to equip the sheer number of federal agents, what does that say about the number of federal agents?
“It’s not the number of bullets we need to worry about,” Jeff Knox, director of The Firearms Coalition, told WND, “but the number of feds with guns it takes to use those bullets.”
“There are currently more than 70 different federal law enforcement agencies employing over 120,000 officers with arrest and firearms authority, according to Bureau of Justice Statistics data for 2008,” explained Knox in a recent WND column. “That’s an increase of nearly 30 percent between 2004 and 2008. If the trends have continued upward at a relatively steady rate, that would put the total number of federal law enforcement officers at somewhere between 135,000 and 145,000.
“That’s a pretty staggering number,” Knox continued, “especially when you consider that there are only an estimated 765,000 state and local law enforcement officers. That means that about one in seven law enforcement officers in the country works directly for the federal government, not a local jurisdiction.”
For years, WND has been at the forefront of reporting the growth in federal police power being dispersed across dozens of government agencies:
“But bureaucrats who inspect the records of retailers and manufacturers have no business carrying guns and badges,” Knox opined, “nor do those who investigate white-collar crime for the Small Business Administration and the Department of Education.”
Chris Knox, director of communications for The Firearms Coalition, told WND legitimate concerns about a police state stem from “a set of three intertwined problems,” namely, “militarization of local police, federalization of law enforcement (including local cops getting goodies from federal forfeiture actions) and the expansion of federal law enforcement, where nearly every agency has its own armed service, not just the Drug Enforcement Agency, but administrative agencies like the Department of Education.”
Give all those federal cops two billion bullets, Jeff Knox says, and now there’s cause for concern.
Federal, non-military agencies, noted radio host Mark Levin last week, have purchased enough ammunition recently to not only shoot every American five times, but also engage in a prolonged, domestic war.
The numbers are based on recent reports that put the total federal ammunition buy in the last 10 months at approaching two billion rounds.
“To provide some perspective,” Levin noted, “experts estimate that at the peak of the Iraq war American troops were firing around 5.5 million rounds per month. At that rate, the [Department of Homeland Security] is armed now for a 24-year Iraq war. A 24-year Iraq war!”
What do federal agencies need with all that ammunition?
The government’s only official explanation for the massive ammo buy is that law enforcement agents in the respective agencies need the bullets for “mandatory quarterly firearms qualifications and other training sessions.”
The staggering number and lack of details in the official explanation, however, has led to rampant speculation, including concerns the DHS is arming itself to fight off insurrection among Americans.
“I’m going to tell you what I think is going on,” Levin offered. “I don’t think domestic insurrection.
Law enforcement and national security agencies, they play out multiple scenarios. … I’ll tell you what I think they’re simulating: the collapse of our financial system, the collapse of our society and the potential for widespread violence, looting, killing in the streets, because that’s what happens when an economy collapses.
“I suspect that just in case our fiscal situation, our monetary situation, collapses, and following it the civil society collapses, that is the rule of law, they want to be prepared,” Levin said. “I know why the government’s arming up: It’s not because there’s going to be an insurrection; it’s because our society is unraveling.”
As WND reported, even major gun-rights organizations like the National Rifle Association have attempted to tamp down worries over the amount of ammunition, suggesting the number of bullets bought, spread out over five years and across all the federal agencies with armed agents – considering the number of rounds needed for training, qualification and service bags – isn’t exorbitant.
At the same time, however, others have wondered if billions of bullets isn’t too many to equip the sheer number of federal agents, what does that say about the number of federal agents?
“It’s not the number of bullets we need to worry about,” Jeff Knox, director of The Firearms Coalition, told WND, “but the number of feds with guns it takes to use those bullets.”
“There are currently more than 70 different federal law enforcement agencies employing over 120,000 officers with arrest and firearms authority, according to Bureau of Justice Statistics data for 2008,” explained Knox in a recent WND column. “That’s an increase of nearly 30 percent between 2004 and 2008. If the trends have continued upward at a relatively steady rate, that would put the total number of federal law enforcement officers at somewhere between 135,000 and 145,000.
“That’s a pretty staggering number,” Knox continued, “especially when you consider that there are only an estimated 765,000 state and local law enforcement officers. That means that about one in seven law enforcement officers in the country works directly for the federal government, not a local jurisdiction.”
For years, WND has been at the forefront of reporting the growth in federal police power being dispersed across dozens of government agencies:
- In 1997, WND blew the lid off 60,000 federal agents enforcing over 3,000 criminal laws, a report that prompted Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America to remark, “Good grief, that’s a standing army. … It’s outrageous.”
- Also in 1997, as part of a ongoing series on the militarization of the federal government, WND reported on the armed, “environment crime” cops employed by the Environmental Protection Agency and a federal law enforcement program that had trained 325,000 prospective federal police since 1970.
- WND also reported on thousands of armed officers in the Inspectors’ General office and a gun-drawn raid on a local flood control center to haul off 40 boxes of … paperwork.
- WND further reported on a plan by then Delaware Sen. Joe Biden to hire hundreds of armed Hong Kong policemen into dozens of U.S. federal agencies to counter Asian organized crime in America.
- In 1999, WND CEO Joseph Farah warned there were more than 80,000 armed federal law enforcement agents, constituting “the virtual standing army over which the founding fathers had
nightmares.” Today, that number has nearly doubled. - Also in 1999 WND reported plans made for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, to use military and police forces to deal with Y2K.
- In 2000, Farah discussed a Justice Department report on the growth of federal police agents under President Clinton, something Farah labeled “the biggest arms buildup in the history of the
federal government – and it’s not taking place in the Defense Department.” - A 2001 report warned of a persistent campaign by the Department of the Interior, this time following 9/11, to gain police powers for its agents.
- In 2008, WND reported on proposed rules to expand the military’s use inside U.S. borders to prevent “environmental damage” or respond to “special events” and to establish policies for “military support for civilian law enforcement.”
- Most recently, WND reported that while local police have found themselves short of necessary ammunition, the federal government has been stockpiling billions of rounds for its non-military, non-FBI law enforcement officers.
“But bureaucrats who inspect the records of retailers and manufacturers have no business carrying guns and badges,” Knox opined, “nor do those who investigate white-collar crime for the Small Business Administration and the Department of Education.”
Chris Knox, director of communications for The Firearms Coalition, told WND legitimate concerns about a police state stem from “a set of three intertwined problems,” namely, “militarization of local police, federalization of law enforcement (including local cops getting goodies from federal forfeiture actions) and the expansion of federal law enforcement, where nearly every agency has its own armed service, not just the Drug Enforcement Agency, but administrative agencies like the Department of Education.”
Give all those federal cops two billion bullets, Jeff Knox says, and now there’s cause for concern.
Iran: Israel will pay for Lebanon assassination
End Of Days News
Ali Shirazi, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's
representative in the Revolutionary Guard, said that Israel will soon pay for
Hassan Shateri's assassination, Fox News reported.
Shateri, a high ranking official in the Revolutionary Guard, was
killed this week in Lebanon in uncertain circumstances. Shirazi vowed to take
revenge on Israel, accusing "Israeli mercenaries" for Shateri's death.
(Ynet)
Nasrallah threatens to 'plunge Israel into darkness'
End Of Days News
| Nasrallah threatens to 'plunge Israel into darkness' |
Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah threatens to target
Israeli power plants and ports if Israel takes military action in Lebanon: "A
few missiles would plunge Israel into darkness" • Hamas official accuses Israel
of being behind Bulgaria expulsion.
|
Hezbollah
leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah speaks via a video link, Saturday.
|
Photo credit: AP  |
Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah said Saturday
that he would not comment on a recent Bulgarian report finding that members of
the Lebanese terrorist group carried out an attack that killed five Israeli
tourists last summer, saying only that the "issue is being followed calmly and
closely."
Speaking to hundreds of supporters via video link,
Nasrallah said Israel had already accused his terrorist group of being behind
the attack before the Bulgarian report was released.
Nasrallah also warned the Jewish state against attacking
Lebanon, saying Hezbollah's response would be harsh.
The July 18 bombing at an airport in Bulgaria's Black Sea resort of Burgas
killed five Israelis and a Bulgarian bus driver.
As well as the bomber, who was also killed and whose
identity has not been established, two other men are suspected of involvement in
the attack. The names of the two other suspects, who are believed to still be
alive, have not been made public.
The European Union, of which Bulgaria is a member, regards
Hezbollah as a legitimate political organization and has resisted calls to
blacklist the group or declare it a terrorist organization.
Nasrallah's speech marked the anniversary of the death of
three Hezbollah leaders, including top military commander Imad Mughniyeh, who
was killed in a car bomb in the Syrian capital of Damascus in 2008. Hezbollah
blamed Israel for Mughniyeh's death and vowed to avenge him.
Nasrallah warned that anyone who thinks Hezbollah is
vulnerable because of Syria's civil war is mistaken. He also said that the group
had all the weapons it needed in case war broke out with Israel, and it would
not need to import them from allies Syria and Iran.
"The resistance will not be silent regarding any
aggression against Lebanon," Nasrallah said. He added that Hezbollah had the
capability to strike at Israel's "ports, airports and power stations."
"A few missiles would plunge Israel into darkness,"
Nasrallah said, referring to plans to attack power stations. "Can Israel survive
six months in the dark?"
Nasrallah threatened to cover Israel in missiles "from
Kiryat Shmona to Eilat," referring to towns in Israel’s northern and southern
extremes.
Meanwhile, the leader of a four-member Hamas delegation
expelled from Bulgaria last week has accused Israel of pressuring Bulgaria to
kick the Palestinians out of the country.
Salah Bardawil made the remarks Saturday after arriving in
Cairo en route back to the Gaza Strip, where the Islamist terrorist group Hamas
holds power. He offered no evidence to back up his claim.
Calls to Israeli officials went unanswered.
Bulgaria expelled the men Friday, saying they represented
"a serious threat to national security."
Bulgaria's interior minister said the men arrived on valid
visas but on ones issued "on different motives from those they demonstrated
here."
Bardawil said the delegation met with media and some
political figures during the visit.
Are you under the spell of media hypnosis? Take this simple test and find out
End Of Days News
(NaturalNews) Here's a valuable self-test to find out whether you've been hypnotized (and controlled) by the mainstream media and its engineered false reality. After you take this test, watch the stage hypnosis videos I've selected for you, below, and you'll be astonished to learn just how hypnotized most people really are.
Test Question #1) Were the fires that burned up Christopher Dorner set by the LAPD?
Minutes before fires broke out in the cabin where homicide suspect Chris Dorner was holed up, the LAPD ordered all media helicopters and video journalists to clear the area. The following conversation was then heard on police radios:
"We're gonna go forward with the plan with the burner."
"Like we talked about."
"Burners deployed, and we have a fire."
Repeated by dispatcher: "Burners deployed, and we have a fire."
"(unintelligible)...mission success."
"We have fire in the front. He might come out the back."
"Looks like it's starting to collapse."
"We're gonna start bringing fire in, about 200 yards out."
"Break 61 Lincon, 61 Charlie, you ready for fire?"
All this starts around the 1:00 mark in the following video:
Fire then breaks out, burning down the cabin along with Christopher Dorner, the homicide suspect.
The San Bernadino sheriff's department, which had authority on the scene, then declared that nobody set the fires and they have no idea how the fires happened. Those fires were spontaneous fires, they claim, which erupted on their own.
So here's the hypnosis test question: Do you believe the claim that law enforcement did not set the fires?
If so, you are hypnotized by the media into a state of extreme gullibility. Please keep score and continue...
But now, since the media has been unable to suppress the truth about these huge ammo purchases by the U.S. government, the script it being flipped: Now we're told these purchases are all about saving taxpayers money by "buying in bulk."
Yep, the government's purchase of 1.6 billion rounds of ammo is all about saving YOU money! Well gee, how nice of them! But don't forget that this is enough ammunition to shoot every person in America five times. If this is "bulk purchasing," it's the equivalent of you and I driving to Costco and buying 50,000 pounds of peanut butter and having it loaded onto railroad cars with the claim that we're "saving money on peanut butter!"
It's no longer a conspiracy theory that the government is buying all these bullets; it's now explained by the media as a "benefit" to the taxpayers.
Question: Do you believe these ammo purchases are being done solely to SAVE taxpayers money?
If so, you've been hypnotized yet again by the mainstream media into a state of total stupidity. By this logic, they could buy human incineration ovens in bulk and claim they're saving taxpayers money by purchasing in bulk.
What's clear is that the U.S. government is engaged in an arms race, stockpiling and hoarding masses of ammunition to prepare for war with the American people.
In other words, he's claiming that cops carry guns to intimidate and show power, not to protect themselves defensively. He further implies, ridiculously, that guns are in no way a deterrent against violence -- that a violent assailant is just as likely to attack an unarmed person as an armed person wielding a gun in self defense.
Ken James, of course, just broadcast to the entire world that he has an IQ no higher than room temperature... on the Celsius scale! But the media plays it off as if his arguments somehow make sense: that ALL guns are offensive weapons and have no role in self defense.
So here's the question: Do you agree with Ken James that guns have no role as a defensive weapon, even for cops? That guns are only offensive weapons used to intimidate and show power?
If so, you've been hypnotized by the media once again into believing something that's off-the-wall stupid.
Except building 7 wasn't hit by any airplane at all. Only two buildings were hit by airplanes -- the twin towers. Building 7 was hit by nothing except some falling debris.
According to official reports -- which of course require you suspend all belief in the laws of physics -- building 7's internal support structures all snapped at precisely to same moment due to a couple of office fires burning inside the building, causing it to miraculously collapse demolition-style into its own footprint.
Although such a feat normally requires months of planning, engineering calculations and the careful placement of demolition charges on building support structures, we are told that none of this was needed in the case of building 7; that office fires melted concrete-and-steel structural columns simultaneously throughout the building. Never before in the recorded history of architecture has a fire ever brought down a concrete-and-steel building, but we're supposed to believe it somehow happened with building 7 in a perfect pattern of symmetrical collapse.
So here's the question: Do you believe the official story on building 7? If so, you've been wildly hypnotized by the media into believing an obvious fiction that wholly violates the laws of physics and materials science. Concrete doesn't burn, for starters, and getting a building like that to fall into its own footprint requires all the concrete and steel support columns to be severed almost simultaneously.
And yet, amazingly, most Americans believe whatever the media tells them. They are easily hypnotized into imagining they are seeing things that really aren't there. It's no different than a person under the influence of a stage hypnosis expert running around thinking they have a glass of water in their hands because they were told to believe so.
(NaturalNews) Here's a valuable self-test to find out whether you've been hypnotized (and controlled) by the mainstream media and its engineered false reality. After you take this test, watch the stage hypnosis videos I've selected for you, below, and you'll be astonished to learn just how hypnotized most people really are.
Test Question #1) Were the fires that burned up Christopher Dorner set by the LAPD?
Minutes before fires broke out in the cabin where homicide suspect Chris Dorner was holed up, the LAPD ordered all media helicopters and video journalists to clear the area. The following conversation was then heard on police radios:
"We're gonna go forward with the plan with the burner."
"Like we talked about."
"Burners deployed, and we have a fire."
Repeated by dispatcher: "Burners deployed, and we have a fire."
"(unintelligible)...mission success."
"We have fire in the front. He might come out the back."
"Looks like it's starting to collapse."
"We're gonna start bringing fire in, about 200 yards out."
"Break 61 Lincon, 61 Charlie, you ready for fire?"
All this starts around the 1:00 mark in the following video:
Fire then breaks out, burning down the cabin along with Christopher Dorner, the homicide suspect.
The San Bernadino sheriff's department, which had authority on the scene, then declared that nobody set the fires and they have no idea how the fires happened. Those fires were spontaneous fires, they claim, which erupted on their own.
So here's the hypnosis test question: Do you believe the claim that law enforcement did not set the fires?
If so, you are hypnotized by the media into a state of extreme gullibility. Please keep score and continue...
Test Question #2: Why is the U.S. government buying 1.6 billion rounds of ammo?
When Natural News and InfoWars first reported that the U.S. government was buying 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition to use domestically -- that's enough to wage at least a 7-year full-scale war with the American people -- we were first called "conspiracy theorists" and it was widely claimed that our allegations were false.But now, since the media has been unable to suppress the truth about these huge ammo purchases by the U.S. government, the script it being flipped: Now we're told these purchases are all about saving taxpayers money by "buying in bulk."
Yep, the government's purchase of 1.6 billion rounds of ammo is all about saving YOU money! Well gee, how nice of them! But don't forget that this is enough ammunition to shoot every person in America five times. If this is "bulk purchasing," it's the equivalent of you and I driving to Costco and buying 50,000 pounds of peanut butter and having it loaded onto railroad cars with the claim that we're "saving money on peanut butter!"
It's no longer a conspiracy theory that the government is buying all these bullets; it's now explained by the media as a "benefit" to the taxpayers.
Question: Do you believe these ammo purchases are being done solely to SAVE taxpayers money?
If so, you've been hypnotized yet again by the mainstream media into a state of total stupidity. By this logic, they could buy human incineration ovens in bulk and claim they're saving taxpayers money by purchasing in bulk.
What's clear is that the U.S. government is engaged in an arms race, stockpiling and hoarding masses of ammunition to prepare for war with the American people.
Test Question #3: Can guns be defensive weapons?
An anti-gun California police boss named Ken James just told reporters, on camera, that "A gun is not a defensive weapon." He goes on to explain, in his own twisted logic: "A gun is an offensive weapon used to intimidate and show power. Police officers don't carry a gun as a defensive weapon to defend themselves or their other officers."In other words, he's claiming that cops carry guns to intimidate and show power, not to protect themselves defensively. He further implies, ridiculously, that guns are in no way a deterrent against violence -- that a violent assailant is just as likely to attack an unarmed person as an armed person wielding a gun in self defense.
Ken James, of course, just broadcast to the entire world that he has an IQ no higher than room temperature... on the Celsius scale! But the media plays it off as if his arguments somehow make sense: that ALL guns are offensive weapons and have no role in self defense.
So here's the question: Do you agree with Ken James that guns have no role as a defensive weapon, even for cops? That guns are only offensive weapons used to intimidate and show power?
If so, you've been hypnotized by the media once again into believing something that's off-the-wall stupid.
Final question: Building 7
Now here's the really big question on media hypnosis. Nearly everyone in the mainstream has been hypnotized into thinking that on 9/11/2001, building 7 of the World Trade Center was brought down after being hit by an airplane.Except building 7 wasn't hit by any airplane at all. Only two buildings were hit by airplanes -- the twin towers. Building 7 was hit by nothing except some falling debris.
According to official reports -- which of course require you suspend all belief in the laws of physics -- building 7's internal support structures all snapped at precisely to same moment due to a couple of office fires burning inside the building, causing it to miraculously collapse demolition-style into its own footprint.
Although such a feat normally requires months of planning, engineering calculations and the careful placement of demolition charges on building support structures, we are told that none of this was needed in the case of building 7; that office fires melted concrete-and-steel structural columns simultaneously throughout the building. Never before in the recorded history of architecture has a fire ever brought down a concrete-and-steel building, but we're supposed to believe it somehow happened with building 7 in a perfect pattern of symmetrical collapse.
So here's the question: Do you believe the official story on building 7? If so, you've been wildly hypnotized by the media into believing an obvious fiction that wholly violates the laws of physics and materials science. Concrete doesn't burn, for starters, and getting a building like that to fall into its own footprint requires all the concrete and steel support columns to be severed almost simultaneously.
And yet, amazingly, most Americans believe whatever the media tells them. They are easily hypnotized into imagining they are seeing things that really aren't there. It's no different than a person under the influence of a stage hypnosis expert running around thinking they have a glass of water in their hands because they were told to believe so.
You are living in a hypnotized nation
Hypnosis is the process of reshaping the mind's interpretation of sensory data. Through hypnosis, a person could be holding a red toy fire truck in their hands but told the fire truck is actually green. When asked what color the fire truck is, they will answer, "Green!"
The success of hypnosis relies on the suggestibility hard-wired into a person's brain. Some people are far more suggestible than others. Those of us who are leaders in "alternative news" tend to be the least suggestible of all, while those who produce and consume mainstream media news are the most suggestible (and therefore gullible).
Successful hypnosis on a national scale requires a masterful hypnotist. That's Obama, one of the most brilliant hypnotists ever observed in the history of politics. Obama's skill is so good that he can tell you he's doing the exact opposite of what he's actually doing, and most people listening will believe every word he says. Obama is creating jobs. Obama is protecting your rights. And the fire truck is green.
If you are immune to hypnosis, then you share my frustrating in living in a nation of hypnotized people. I want to shout to people, "The fire truck is RED!" but of course this makes no sense to them, as they've been hypnotized into thinking it's green.
The success of hypnosis relies on the suggestibility hard-wired into a person's brain. Some people are far more suggestible than others. Those of us who are leaders in "alternative news" tend to be the least suggestible of all, while those who produce and consume mainstream media news are the most suggestible (and therefore gullible).
Successful hypnosis on a national scale requires a masterful hypnotist. That's Obama, one of the most brilliant hypnotists ever observed in the history of politics. Obama's skill is so good that he can tell you he's doing the exact opposite of what he's actually doing, and most people listening will believe every word he says. Obama is creating jobs. Obama is protecting your rights. And the fire truck is green.
If you are immune to hypnosis, then you share my frustrating in living in a nation of hypnotized people. I want to shout to people, "The fire truck is RED!" but of course this makes no sense to them, as they've been hypnotized into thinking it's green.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)